Survey and communications at HT1

Home of Classic Starfire, the 3rd edition of Starfire, based on the novels by David Weber, Steve White, and Charles Gannon.

Moderators: SDS Members, SDS Owner

Forum rules
Forum rules
1. Nothing obscene.
2. No advertising or spamming.
3. No personal information. Mostly aimed at the posting of OTHER people's information.
4. No flame wars. We encourage debate, but it becomes a flame when insults fly and tempers flare.

Try to stick with the forum's topic. Threads that belong to another forum will be moved to that forum.

Survey and communications at HT1

Postby Caplin on Mon 24 Aug 2015 17:57

Hi All,

So I'm trying to get an initial solo campaign going using the SM2 New Empires start, and I'm wondering how people handle communication in the survey process.

At HT1 there are no drones to carry messages, so the only way for the capital to know what's behind a given warp point is for something to come back and tell them.
One thing classic SF doesn't cover is standard operating procedures, as far as I can see. Do people write survey procedures anyway?

I'm thinking of something like this: when probing a system, if no populations detected, begin a rough survey. If populations are detected, advise the nearest ICC and wait for orders.

At the strategic level, SM2 in general seems to be much less finicky about timing than the ISF system. I'm just wondering how fast and loose people play things. I could kind of ignore the whole communication subsystem entirely if I wanted to, but that's no fun at all. On the strategic level, I'm thinking that it's safe to assume info can be passed in system in one pulse.

Thanks for any input :)
Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were, but without it we go nowhere.
Caplin
Commander
Commander
 
Posts: 110
Joined: Sun 11 May 2014 22:16
Location: Washington State

Re: Survey and communications at HT1

Postby Cralis on Mon 24 Aug 2015 22:32

Caplin wrote:So I'm trying to get an initial solo campaign going using the SM2 New Empires start, and I'm wondering how people handle communication in the survey process.


There is pretty much only one way to do communications at HT1: use a ship to carry the message. Most of the time players use EX or ES (depending upon which version of third edition, you should have EX with SM2) that have the maximum speed possible.

At HT1 there are no drones to carry messages, so the only way for the capital to know what's behind a given warp point is for something to come back and tell them.

One thing classic SF doesn't cover is standard operating procedures, as far as I can see. Do people write survey procedures anyway?


In multiplayer: absolutely a must. Many solo players don't because they just remember what they want each race to do, and it gives them some flexibility, but I personally always write them down because my memory sucks and I want to remember how I want each race to act. I do more than just SOPs, I write lots of notes on what I want them to do and be and act like.

I'm thinking of something like this: when probing a system, if no populations detected, begin a rough survey. If populations are detected, advise the nearest ICC and wait for orders.


What about contacting an unknown vessel?

What about a WP that your ships go in, and nobody comes back out?

What about your adjacent surveys when one of several groups encounters an alien population?

And there's more...

At the strategic level, SM2 in general seems to be much less finicky about timing than the ISF system. I'm just wondering how fast and loose people play things. I could kind of ignore the whole communication subsystem entirely if I wanted to, but that's no fun at all. On the strategic level, I'm thinking that it's safe to assume info can be passed in system in one pulse.


With SM2 everything is based on the StMP (Strategic Movement Point). Most people that I've seen play go one of two routes: they either completely do everything by StMP, or they calculate every movement, every communication, everything down to the tactical turn. Personally, by StMP is good enough for 9 out of 10 cases, and you can always do some rough calculations if the exact timing matters.

Thanks for any input :)


No problem!
Image
User avatar
Cralis
SDS Member
SDS Member
 
Posts: 10197
Joined: Tue 30 Jun 2009 19:27
Location: Oregon, USA

Re: Survey and communications at HT1

Postby Caplin on Tue 25 Aug 2015 08:31

Yeah… Clearly i need to think more about different possibilities. :)

I guess what's tripping me up is that in the case of habitable surveys, for instance, ships will have to return through the WP to transmit messages about potential colonization sites etc. Do players routinely send non-survey escorts through with their survey groups to relay that kind of message back?

I'm probably thinking too hard about this stuff, but I have a slightly obsessive need to get it right. It's a symptom of how much I like something.
Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were, but without it we go nowhere.
Caplin
Commander
Commander
 
Posts: 110
Joined: Sun 11 May 2014 22:16
Location: Washington State

Re: Survey and communications at HT1

Postby aramis on Mon 14 Sep 2015 03:00

Caplin wrote:Yeah… Clearly i need to think more about different possibilities. :)

I guess what's tripping me up is that in the case of habitable surveys, for instance, ships will have to return through the WP to transmit messages about potential colonization sites etc. Do players routinely send non-survey escorts through with their survey groups to relay that kind of message back?

I'm probably thinking too hard about this stuff, but I have a slightly obsessive need to get it right. It's a symptom of how much I like something.

In general, in the games I ran, SOP was 1 went through, then sent a CD back at HT2, or came RIGHT back at HT1. The courier was usually close to one of:
(2) SAAAAAAHQs(I)(I)(I) (6)
(2) SAAAAAHQs(Ic)(Ic) (4)
(2) SAAADHQS(Ic)(Ic) (4)
The hold is for carrying maintenance.

If it didn't come back, another would be tried in about 3 turns. If that didn't come back, mark it as hostile.
aramis
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Mon 01 Mar 2010 00:42
Location: Eagle River, Alaska

Re: Survey and communications at HT1

Postby Caplin on Mon 14 Sep 2015 15:36

Ah, that clarifies things nicely. I decided to equip each of my survey fleets with a laser-armed escort, on the idea that it would be the escort actually going in and doing the probe. Unfortunately, I'm a bit wary of continuing too much further in my current game without a good way of dealing with system and tactical level movement. The example is certainly helpful though.
Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were, but without it we go nowhere.
Caplin
Commander
Commander
 
Posts: 110
Joined: Sun 11 May 2014 22:16
Location: Washington State

Re: Survey and communications at HT1

Postby LordKron on Mon 14 Sep 2015 20:40

If you're playing based on original 3rd ed, I would do the couriers as 8 HS ES designs to keep the cost down. If you're going with 3rdR, 7 HS EX class ships are ideal message boats.
LordKron
Commander
Commander
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Thu 27 Aug 2015 17:16

Re: Survey and communications at HT1

Postby aramis on Sat 19 Sep 2015 04:15

LordKron wrote:If you're playing based on original 3rd ed, I would do the couriers as 8 HS ES designs to keep the cost down. If you're going with 3rdR, 7 HS EX class ships are ideal message boats.

agreed. As soon as one can (TL4), sending a tender in to lay DSB-Com seems appropo... once your EX WP=crasher has established you don't immediately die on the other side.

Let's see
Code: Select all
5 05 Hull
2 04 Ic
1 15 Qs
1 04 S
1 02 A
MGC 29

EX-Courier 29 MGC
(2) SAQs(Ic) (4)

It can and will die if attacked.
I made them (AC) when I used them, upping the cost by 0.5 MGC.
aramis
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Mon 01 Mar 2010 00:42
Location: Eagle River, Alaska

Re: Survey and communications at HT1

Postby LordKron on Sat 19 Sep 2015 05:39

In 3rdR that design isn't legal. Violates the 20% limit on military systems to be considered a freighter, and as a warship (even unarmed it needs a cargo hold). Swap out A for H (least expensive option) or (BbS) and a shuttle (not bad for surveys) and it works.
LordKron
Commander
Commander
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Thu 27 Aug 2015 17:16

Re: Survey and communications at HT1

Postby krenshala on Wed 30 Sep 2015 14:30

While it has more than 20% military systems, it is still a valid design. Being more than 20% military just means it has to pay the military hull maintenance rate.
-- krenshala
None survive the harvest!

Yeah, I'm finally back (again)! Sometimes, life (and 9yo son's) don't leave you time to play SF and earn a paycheck. :/

No, really! Matt actually made me an admin here!
krenshala
SDS Member
SDS Member
 
Posts: 2500
Joined: Thu 02 Jul 2009 17:13
Location: Austin TX, NorAm, Sol III

Re: Survey and communications at HT1

Postby aramis on Thu 01 Oct 2015 03:08

LordKron wrote:In 3rdR that design isn't legal. Violates the 20% limit on military systems to be considered a freighter, and as a warship (even unarmed it needs a cargo hold). Swap out A for H (least expensive option) or (BbS) and a shuttle (not bad for surveys) and it works.

It was paid for as a military hull, not a freighter.
There is no hold requirement for small military ships which mount the needed Qs for the Lh and Q requirement.

Now, when I first ran a campaign... it wouldn't be legal because it was too small... and would have been about the same cost... SAHDIIIIII was my 2E version...
aramis
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Mon 01 Mar 2010 00:42
Location: Eagle River, Alaska

Next

Return to Classic Starfire

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron