
Moderators: SDS Members, SDS Owner
wievil wrote:I emailed the orders address for my 6.2 upgrade and later got an email. I don't check that email every day and the link to download the update had expired.
Cralis wrote:I've emailed it to you twice now I think. If you are expecting a reply with something that has a time limit, you might check it every day until it comes
Club wrote:I'm not sure what the issue is, but acrobat really doesn't like the file you guys sent me. The only thing I've seen act similar is a ten year old computer trying to display a 200mb file, which considering that I've got a new machine running a very small file is weird.
The comp had to think about it for well over fifteen seconds before displaying the cover page picture.
It's still readable, just reporting an odd experience.
wievil wrote:Wasn't expecting a link with a time limit.Never was sent anything other than an attachment before.
I've only recieved the one order reply last Friday. Nothing seen since.
dazrand wrote:During production we ended up using two different identifiers for the versions of the rules. The main one is 6.02 and represents the version. The SSF-201307 is more of a build version of 6.02 and shows roughly when it published.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests