Black Holes

News about space exploration and scientific advancements. What do you find interesting?

Moderators: SDS Owner, SDS Members

Forum rules
The forum is intended only for space and science information. Discussions about how it applies to Starfire is encouraged - there might be some great ideas we can use!

1. Nothing obscene.
2. No advertising or spamming.
3. No personal information. Mostly aimed at the posting of OTHER people's information.
4. No flame wars. We encourage debate, but it becomes a flame when insults fly and tempers flare.

Black Holes

Postby Whitecold on Wed 10 Apr 2019 09:13

Whitecold
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
 
Posts: 536
Joined: Fri 19 Sep 2014 15:03

Re: Black Holes

Postby aramis on Tue 16 Apr 2019 06:01

Technically, not a photograph. No camera.

A mathematically constructed image taken from observational data.

The project lead discusses the process here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGL_OL3OrCE

There's a LOT of data massaging happening. It's no less synthetic than the Mars DEM maps. Yes, the data is real, the image is accurate, but it's not actually a photograph; you wouldn't see that if you were close by it. (In part, because the image is from wavelengths we cannot see.)
aramis
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
 
Posts: 328
Joined: Mon 01 Mar 2010 00:42
Location: Eagle River, Alaska

Re: Black Holes

Postby Cralis on Tue 16 Apr 2019 08:54

A “simulated image” I believe is what they called it. In many ways that makes it even more amazing!
Image
User avatar
Cralis
SDS Member
SDS Member
 
Posts: 11232
Joined: Tue 30 Jun 2009 19:27
Location: Oregon, USA

Re: Black Holes

Postby aramis on Wed 17 Apr 2019 00:51

Cralis wrote:A “simulated image” I believe is what they called it. In many ways that makes it even more amazing!

Agreed...

Visual interferometry CAN be a photograph ... it can be done "in camera" as it were ... but given the method...

The attention to bias is also interesting. As is that they're training neural nets to collate the data in place of people. They've even sent some groups bogus data to make certain that the results of the process aren't biased towards what was expected.

200+ people, 20 countries, 11 radio-scopes¹...

:twisted: Essentially, proof that a datagroup should be able to use a bigger detection range than a single set of sensors... :twisted:

¹ graphic on John Michael Godier's Event Horizon, ep "This is the "First Image of a Black Hole With Dr. Feryal Ozel" (released 16 Apr 2019 on YouTube.)
aramis
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
 
Posts: 328
Joined: Mon 01 Mar 2010 00:42
Location: Eagle River, Alaska

Re: Black Holes

Postby Cralis on Wed 17 Apr 2019 13:00

The three days of observation and weeks of processing might not work for tactical planning or targeting solutions :D
Image
User avatar
Cralis
SDS Member
SDS Member
 
Posts: 11232
Joined: Tue 30 Jun 2009 19:27
Location: Oregon, USA

Re: Black Holes

Postby aramis on Thu 18 Apr 2019 03:51

Cralis wrote:The three days of observation and weeks of processing might not work for tactical planning or targeting solutions :D


The data feed is actually reduced for closer/higher-angle targets.

The process took so long on this one because they were proving the tech, and because it's about as extreme a case as can be done with current tech.

Interfereometry at Keck was nearly real-time.
aramis
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
 
Posts: 328
Joined: Mon 01 Mar 2010 00:42
Location: Eagle River, Alaska


Return to Space and Science

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

cron